Upcoding and unbundling are methods of healthcare billing fraud involving the improper application of codes for medical diagnoses and procedures.
Healthcare providers and facilities that offer services to Medicare, Medicaid, and Tricare patients receive reimbursements from the government. When these healthcare providers and facilities improperly code the medical services they’ve provided in order to receive higher reimbursements, they commit coding fraud.
Improper medical billing is just one method of defrauding government healthcare programs. Coding fraud, along with pharmaceutical fraud, illegal physician kickbacks, and pharmacy fraud, cost the federal government and taxpayers billions of dollars a year and raise the cost of healthcare services.
Healthcare Whistleblowers Rewards & Protection
Under the False Claims Act, both the federal government and private citizens can prosecute and stop healthcare fraud. When a private citizen, or whistleblower, with information about healthcare fraud brings a successful qui tam lawsuit that results in a government recovery, they share in up to 30% of the money returned to federal healthcare programs.
The False Claims Act also protects healthcare whistleblowers from harassment, discrimination, or retaliation by their employers, including termination.
Report Coding Fraud to a Trusted Whistleblower Lawyer
If you have information about a medical provider or institution committing healthcare billing fraud, know your rights and protections as a whistleblower. For a free and confidential consultation with an experienced whistleblower attorney, please contact us at (800) 254-9493 or by filling out the form to the right.
Our lawyers are committed to protecting whistleblowers’ rights and recovering money that was fraudulently taken from the government. Our law firm works with whistleblowers on a contingency basis, which means there is no payment unless funds are recovered and the whistleblower is paid a reward.
What is Upcoding?
Upcoding is when a healthcare service provider uses the billing code for a more expensive procedure when, in reality, a less expensive procedure was performed.
Alternatively, upcoding also includes when a healthcare service provider indicates that a patient has a more serious diagnosis than they actually do, in order to increase the reimbursement rate that insurance will pay.
What are Examples of Upcoding in Healthcare
A example of upcoding in healthcare could be a Medicare patient visits a doctor for an annual routine checkup, a service typically reimbursed by Medicare at $50. The doctor, however, codes the visit as a more expansive checkup, which is reimbursed by Medicare at $100. By miscoding the patient’s visit, the physician has committed Medicare fraud because, among other things, the physician charged for services which were not provided.
Pharmaceutical companies and medical device manufacturers may also commit healthcare fraud by upcoding. For example, a pharmaceutical company’s medical device could be implanted through two procedures – one more invasive and more expensive than the other. When promoting its device, the pharmaceutical company advised providers to bill for the more expensive procedure, causing federal healthcare programs to pay more than needed.
What is Unbundling?
Unbundling is when a healthcare service provider uses the billing codes for two or more separate procedures when the procedures were actually performed together.
Government healthcare programs reimburse more money for procedures that are performed separately. Procedures that are performed together are termed “bundled services,” and each individual procedure is reimbursed at a lower rate because the government healthcare provider is paying for the procedure as a whole.
Examples of Unbundling in Healthcare
A example of undundling in healthcare could be a surgery typically involves an incision, when the patient is “opened,” and stitches when the patient is “closed.” The incision and the stitches are a bundled service. However, stitches are sometimes performed as a separate procedure, such as when a patient comes into the hospital with a pre-existing wound. If a hospital were to bill for the incision and stitches performed during a surgery as separate procedures, this would be an example of “unbundling.”
Another example would be blood work. Typically, blood work is done in preset blood panels (collections of tests), which are charged at a specific preset rate. Each of the tests within a panel have individual and higher billing rates. Illegal unbundling would occur if a hospital performed the blood panel but fragmented and charges them as individual blood tests. Unbundling can also be referred to as “fragmentation.”
Upcoding & Unbundling Lawsuits
Tenet Healthcare Corporation. In 2006, Tenet Healthcare Corporation resolved a qui tam whistleblower lawsuit alleging that, among other things, Tenet engaged in upcoding by assigning improper and unsupported diagnosis codes to Medicare and Medicaid in order to increase the reimbursement rate for Tenet’s hospitals. Tenet settled the lawsuit for $900 million.
Duke University. In 2014, Duke resolved a False Claims Act lawsuit alleging that it unbundled (and charged separately) for cardiac and anesthesia services that were performed together. Duke settled the lawsuit for $1 million.
Girard Gibbs’ Whistleblower Experience
Girard Gibbs’ whistleblower lawyers have more than two decades of experience prosecuting fraud. Our attorneys have successfully litigated against some of the largest companies in the United States, and we have recovered more than a billion dollars on our clients’ behalf. We have fought some of the most complex cases brought under federal and state laws nationwide, and our attorneys have been recognized with numerous awards and honors for their accomplishments, including Top 100 Super Lawyers in Northern California and The Best Lawyers in America, and rated AV-Preeminent (among the highest class of attorneys for professional ethics and legal skills).
We proudly hold memberships in Taxpayers Against Fraud, a public interest organization dedicated to combating fraud against the government and protecting public resources. Our firm supports the nonprofit’s educational initiatives and efforts to advance public and government support for qui tam whistleblower cases.